Movie
Review 7/8/12
THE BOURNE LEGACY
2012
Starring: Jeremy Renner, Edward
Norton, Rachel Weisz
Directed by: Tony Gilroy
The
last movie that this reviewer saw was the remake of Total Recall, and films like that one would make one think: “do we
really need another Bourne movie – let alone one that doesn’t even have Jason
Bourne in it?” Paul Greengrass, director of the later two Bourne films in the
original trilogy, jokingly suggested making a fourth one named The Bourne Redundancy, and its star Matt
Damon similarly expressed a degree of disdain for a new film. The whole concept
of a franchise spin-off does seem to reek of Hollywood cash grab. However, rest
assured – Bourne’s legacy remains completely untarnished, because, boy, is this
a good one.
This
is best classified as a “side-quel”, the events of the film unfolding at the
same time as those of The Bourne
Ultimatum. Jeremy Renner plays Aaron Cross, an “Outcome” agent – Outcome
being a parallel top-secret project to Treadstone, which Jason Bourne was a
part of. Bourne’s actions have compromised the project, leading the higher-ups
to forcefully dismantle Outcome – this translates to killing everybody involved
and covering up their tracks. This operation is spearheaded by Eric Byer
(Norton), who sends a Predator drone after Cross while the latter is in the
middle of a training exercise in Alaska.
Cross
fakes his death when he realises he’s been, well, double-crossed. Meanwhile, a
doctor goes on a rampage at a pharmaceutical research facility, where drugs
designed to enhance the physical and mental performance of Outcome agents are
developed. Dr Marta Shearing (Weisz), a scientist and doctor who has been
evaluating Cross and the other Outcome agents, escapes, only to be targeted at
her home. Cross saves her and the two go on the run, with Byer and his team
scrambling to track them down. Cross and Shearing head to Manila, where the
pills are manufactured, as Cross comes to realise he’s been in way over his
head just as the drugs begin to wear off.
The Bourne Legacy is, unfortunately, a
movie people haven’t really been excited about. It’s been lost in the shuffle
of late-Summer blockbusters, and its premise has been met with indifference.
Well, Tony Gilroy and co. have to be given their due. This was intended to be a
straight sequel to The Bourne Ultimatum,
with Matt Damon and Paul Greengrass set to reprise their roles as star and
director respectively, but it eventually fell through. It’s safe to say that
Gilroy, who co-wrote all three of the Bourne films and who co-wrote this one
with his brother Dan, has more than salvaged the situation.
The Bourne Legacy is taut, intelligent,
bristling with tension and excitement and is an overall harrowing ride from
start to finish. Gilroy finds a near-perfect blend of smarts and action such
that one never drowns out the other, and, thankfully, he’s less of a shaky-cam
proponent than his predecessor Greengrass was. The story is coherent, the
characters reasonably well-defined, and just like the first three Bourne films
there’s always an undercurrent of credibility, and the realism that The Bourne Identity reinvigorated the
espionage film genre with is in good form here. While some bits, particularly
the “super-soldier” angle, are a bit of a stretch, it’s never ridiculous and
always absorbing. There’s a sense of continuity established by the inclusion of
some footage from Ultimatum as well
as Joan Allen, David Strathairn, Scott Glenn and Albert Finney reprising their
roles in briefer parts, and it’s used just enough so the connection doesn’t
feel contrived.
One
of the primary challenges this film faced was making Aaron Cross a well-defined
character and distinct enough from Jason Bourne. This challenge is mostly
overcome, in that while Cross isn’t as complex and intriguing as Bourne, he’s
still great fun to watch. Jason Bourne was a confused and disoriented man who
had to come to terms with his muddled past, make sense of the remarkable skills
he possessed and preserve whatever new relationships he formed. Aaron Cross on
the other hand knows full well what he’s doing, and is a little more idealistic
and fresh-faced than Bourne was. With the help of those special pills, he gains
incredible physical and mental skills, shuffling between martial artistry,
official documents forgery and resourceful Mac-Gyvering with ease. In an early
scene, he outfoxes a pack of wolves and bests a military drone sent to kill him
at the same time. That’s pretty badass. Of course, there’s a little of the
inner conflict Bourne had so much of, but Renner makes sure to keep the angst
perfectly in check.
Dr
Marta Shearing, as played by Rachel Weisz, is a lot more than the token action
movie chick. It’s a clever move to have the female lead be a scientist
indirectly involved in the protagonist’s predicament, who is as integral to the
plot as he is. Sure, Rachel Weisz probably doesn’t quite look like a genetic
scientist, but she’s a lot more believable than the boatload of hotties
Hollywood has been trying to pass off as geniuses for years (Denise Richards
and Jessica Alba, anyone?) – and a much better actress too. She’s the
frightened woman jolted out of her everyday existence as much as she is an
intelligent and level-headed scientist, and this isn’t one of those films with
a romantic subplot crowbarred in for no reason.
The
antagonists in this film, much as in the first three films, aren’t cackling,
maniacal megalomaniacs – they’re intelligence officers, analysts and
bureaucrats acting under orders, efficient, quietly menacing and dangerously
amoral, with a frightening wealth of resources at their fingertips. Edward
Norton plays the main bad guy – which, for the geeks out there, means Hawkeye
is pitted against the (other) Incredible Hulk. He’s undoubtedly a brilliant
actor, and doesn’t let the fact that his character is mostly confined to
mission control hinder his performance. For the most part though, he never
comes face-to-face with Cross, but he and his team always feel like a menace.
It’s an exciting game of cat and mouse to watch, with Cross half a step ahead
of his pursuers, but never for long.
The Bourne Legacy pulls through,
retaining much of that Bourne spirit yet nary a sense of been-there-done-that
or, God forbid, a direct-to-video feel. It turns out to be quite a bit more than
a decently-written piece of fan-fiction – it’s a clever, high-energy espionage
thriller that could have easily felt slapped-together or cheap, but is instead
well-conceived, well-crafted and well-acted. We certainly hope Matt Damon will
be tempted to return to the series to team up with Renner should a sequel
materialise.
SUMMARY: Our report on The Bourne Legacy: vital signs healthy,
cognitive and motor functions above average, adrenaline levels good – Outcome:
success.
RATING: 4/5 STARS
Jedd Jong
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.