THE LEGEND OF TARZAN
Director : David YatesCast : Alexander Skarsgård, Margot Robbie, Samuel L. Jackson, Christoph Waltz, Djimon Hounsou, Simon Russell Beale, Jim Broadbent
Genre : Action/Adventure
Run Time : 1 hr 49 mins
Opens : 30 June 2016
Rating : PG13 (Violence)
Edgar Rice Burroughs’ Tarzan is an
enduring figure in popular culture, but is now most often viewed as kitschy and
campy. Clad in a loin cloth, yelling as he swings through the trees – he’s not
exactly the action hero modern-day moviegoers have become accustomed to.
Director David Yates, best known for helming the final four instalments in the Harry Potter film series, endeavours for
viewers to take Tarzan seriously again. This take on the story is commendable
in that it wants to be about something, directly addressing the colonialist
politics and the unethical means by which various European nations went about
their conquest of Africa. It’s pretty heady stuff and the film’s approach errs
on the simplistic side, but there’s enough action to ensure the film doesn’t
get bogged down in its sombre themes.
Yates, working from a screenplay by
Craig Brewer and Adam Cozad, approaches this as a work of historical fiction. The
primary antagonist, Léon Rom, is an actual historical figure, who was known for
keeping severed heads in his flowerbed. In addition, George Washington Williams
as depicted in the film is a fictionalisation of a real-life Civil War veteran,
preacher, politician, lawyer, journalist and historian. The 1890 setting is
established with enough detail, but one does occasionally get the sense that
this is an adventure flick putting on stuffy period drama airs.
Skarsgård beat out the likes of
Henry Cavill, Tom Hardy, Charlie Hunnam and swimmer Michael Phelps, who was
toying with using this film to launch an acting career, for the title role. We
first see Tarzan as John Clayton III, trying to fit in among the upper crust,
and Skarsgård ably conveys that this is a man who is not in his element. While
Tarzan is traditionally viewed as a feral man, this version portrays him as a
person of both instinct and intellect, having mastered multiple languages and
well-versed in various cultures. He wants to be seen as more than a mere
oddity. Naturally, we get to see him doff his shirt, and any doubts that he
wouldn’t be able to pull off the necessary muscled physique are quickly
assuaged. For all his efforts, Skarsgård is still encumbered by a certain
stiffness, and this reviewer would like to have seen a more passionate,
unbridled Tarzan.
Yates wanted Jessica Chastain to
portray Jane and the studio had their eyes on Emma Stone, but it’s Robbie who
portrays Tarzan’s lady love. Robbie possesses an irrepressible radiance and
imbues Jane with a charming vigour. The film is able to strike a balance
between putting Jane in peril, as she is expected to be so Tarzan can rescue
her, while also making her a capable character in her own right. She holds her
own opposite Waltz, but the scene in which Jane grits her teeth to sit down for
dinner with Rom is a pale imitation of the similar scene between Belloq and
Marion Ravenwood in Raiders of the Lost
Ark.
There’s no denying Waltz is a
talented actor, but by now, audiences have begun to tire of seeing him typecast
as the villain, and he does nothing different as Rom. The character is the
embodiment of imperialist greed, striding through the jungle with fearsome
troops behind him, taking what he wants at will. There’s no nuance here, and
Waltz often seems extremely close to twirling his moustache. Hounsou strikes an
imposing presence as the tribal leader who has a long-standing vendetta with
Tarzan, but gets too little screen time for their conflict to take hold. Jackson
is entertaining as Williams and the character gets a moment to reflect on his
own history and explain his motivations. However, his performance can’t help
but come off as anachronistic, and Williams is very much a wise-cracking buddy
cop sidekick, which can pull one out of it at times.
There is a great deal of visual
effects work and a multitude of computer-generated animals required to populate
the Congo. Unfortunately, some of these beasts look sillier than others, and
several sequences, particularly a railroad ambush and an ostrich stampede, lack
polish. Tarzan calls on his animal friends for assistance during the climax,
and for a film purported to be a more serious telling of the Tarzan tale, it is
a little goofy.
The world was never aching for
another Tarzan movie, but this one
justifies its existence by incorporating historical elements and setting out to
make a statement about man’s relationship with nature. This is complemented by
a blend of National Geographic-style panoramic vistas and moderately exciting
action beats. While it lacks the heart of the animated version the target teen
audience might be most familiar with, it’s a fine addition to the Tarzan movie
canon, and definitely ranks far above the risible 2014 animated take.
Summary: Historical elements
are cleverly weaved into the familiar Tarzan tale and this is not as much of a
re-tread as one might expect, but there’s still a certain vitality missing from
this version.
RATING: 3.5 out of 5 Stars
Jedd
Jong
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.